Table of Contents
Do not index
Do not index
Short answer:
Traditional DEXes focus on execution. MAIN focuses on execution + intelligence.
Decentralized exchanges were created to remove centralized intermediaries and enable permissionless token swaps. Over time, DEXes improved liquidity, performance, and composability — but the core user experience stayed the same.
Users still need to:
- understand market timing,
- manage liquidity risks manually,
- and actively monitor positions.
MAIN takes a different approach. Instead of only improving execution, it changes how users interact with DeFi.
What Traditional DEXes Do Well
Most traditional DEXes are optimized for three core functions:
- Permissionless token swaps
- Access to shared liquidity pools
- Transparent, on-chain execution
These systems work well for experienced users who:
- know when to enter and exit positions,
- understand impermanent loss and volatility,
- and are comfortable managing positions manually.
Traditional DEXes provide strong infrastructure — but assume users bring the strategy.
Where Traditional DEXes Fall Short
As DeFi grows more complex, several limitations become clear:
- Liquidity positions require constant monitoring
- Advanced strategies require custom scripts or external tools
- Risk management is fully manual
- Interfaces focus on actions, not outcomes
In short, most DEXs execute instructions — they don’t help manage intent.
MAIN’s Core Difference: Intelligent Execution
MAIN operates as a decentralized exchange with an intelligence layer built into execution.
Instead of only offering tools, MAIN provides systems that:
- continuously monitor market conditions
- manage positions based on predefined rules
- automatically execute on-chain actions when criteria are met
This transforms the DEX from a passive venue into an active execution layer.
From Transactions to Workflows
Traditional DEXs are transactional by design:
- swap tokens
- add liquidity
- remove liquidity
Each action is isolated.
MAIN introduces workflows:
- strategies instead of single actions
- ongoing position management instead of static deposits
- automation that runs in the background
Users define goals and constraints.
The system handles execution within those limits.
Control Without Micromanagement
Automation often raises concerns about loss of control. MAIN addresses this directly:
- All actions remain on-chain
- Users define strict boundaries and parameters
- Positions can be paused or exited at any time
Automation doesn’t replace user intent — it enforces it consistently.
Traditional DEX vs MAIN (Quick Comparison)
Aspect | Traditional DEX | MAIN |
Primary role | Execute user actions | Execute + manage intent |
Interaction model | Manual, action-based | Strategy & workflow-based |
Risk management | Fully manual | Automated within user rules |
Liquidity management | Static unless changed | Continuously managed |
User effort | High | Reduced |
Best suited for | Advanced traders | Both beginners and professionals |
A Different Way to Scale DeFi Usage
Traditional DEXs scale by:
- increasing liquidity,
- optimizing execution efficiency.
MAIN scales by reducing complexity:
- fewer manual decisions,
- fewer external tools,
- less constant attention required.
This makes advanced DeFi strategies accessible to users who are not professional traders.
Evolution, Not Replacement
MAIN doesn’t replace existing DEX mechanics.
Swaps, pools, and fees still exist.
What changes is the experience around them.
Instead of forcing users to become experts, MAIN embeds expert-level behavior directly into the system.
That’s the key difference between a traditional DEX and a DEX designed for the next stage of DeFi.
Key Takeaway
Traditional DEX: “Here are the tools — manage everything yourself.”
MAIN: “Define your intent — the system handles execution.”